The Supreme Court has allowed the use of a 2021 map for the upcoming election in Galveston County, despite the fact that it wiped out the county's only majority-minority precinct in violation of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). The decision has raised concerns about the future of the VRA and has been met with criticism from civil rights groups, who argue that it undermines the VRA and will have a detrimental effect on minority voters. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has been asked to take up the case en banc and reverse its decision, setting a precedent that could be used to justify the use of racially gerrymandered maps in the future.
Posts tagged as “the Supreme Court”
Special Counsel Jack Smith is attempting to prevent the trial of former President Donald Trump from slipping past the 2024 presidential election by filing a request with the Supreme Court to take up the case and rule quickly. Trump is currently the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential primary and Smith is attempting to bypass the appeals court to prevent any delays that could push back the trial until after the election. The Supreme Court has yet to respond to Smith's request, and it remains to be seen whether Smith will be successful in his efforts.
Special Counsel Jack Smith has petitioned the Supreme Court to decide whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from prosecution for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. Smith argues that the question is of "imperative public importance" and should be resolved quickly so that Trump's trial can move forward. If the Supreme Court takes up the case, it could have far-reaching implications for the power of the presidency and the ability of former presidents to be held accountable.
Key takeaways: The Supreme Court rejected a First Amendment challenge to a Washington state law that bars licensed health professionals from practicing conversion therapy on…
Key takeaways: The Supreme Court’s decision in Moore v. United States could have far-reaching implications for any future attempts to impose a wealth tax on…
The Supreme Court heard arguments on Monday in a case that could determine the fate of Purdue Pharma's bankruptcy plan, which includes a provision protecting the Sackler family from liability for the opioid epidemic. The Biden administration has objected to the plan, arguing that it gives the Sacklers too much protection, and justices expressed skepticism that a bankruptcy court had legal authority to release the Sacklers from potential legal claims. The Supreme Court's decision could have far-reaching implications for the opioid epidemic and the Sackler family, as it will determine whether the Sacklers will be protected from future civil lawsuits.
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the first woman to serve on the Supreme Court, passed away at the age of 88 due to complications related to advanced dementia. Chief Justice John Roberts praised her as a “fiercely independent defender of the rule of law” and an advocate for civics education. O’Connor was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Ronald Reagan in 1981 and was a strong supporter of civics education, founding the iCivics program and advocating for students to observe oral arguments.
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted on Thursday to issue subpoenas to conservative activists Harlan Crow and Leonard Leo, as part of an investigation into ethics practices at the Supreme Court. Republican members of the committee walked out of the room during the vote, accusing Democrats of attempting to undermine the court. The investigation was launched after reports revealed the court had failed to properly disclose gifts and travel expenses from conservative groups. The committee is now requesting information from Crow and Leo, as part of a new ethics code that requires justices to disclose gifts and travel expenses and recuse themselves from cases in which they have a financial interest.