The Supreme Court of the United States is hearing a case that could have major implications for the future of the internet, brought by the family of a woman killed in a terrorist attack. The court is considering the scope of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which grants tech companies immunity from lawsuits over their content recommendations. Tech companies are closely watching the case to see how it could affect the future of the internet, with a ruling expected by the end of June.
Posts published in “Tech”
The Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday in a case that could have major implications for the way websites rank content. The case involves a lawsuit brought by the family of Nohemi Gonzalez, who was killed in a 2015 ISIS attack, against Google for its automatic recommendations of user content. During the hearing, justices questioned how to protect websites from liability for content they do not create or control, while still exposing harmful content to liability. The court's decision could have a major impact on the way websites rank content.
This week, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear two cases, Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh, which could have major implications for tech companies and social media platforms. Gonzalez v. Google centers around YouTube's role in the 2015 Paris attacks, while Twitter v. Taamneh involves a lawsuit alleging that Twitter provided material support to international terrorism. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, tech companies could be held liable for recommending content to their users or for hosting terrorist content. The outcome of these cases will be closely watched until the Supreme Court issues a ruling later this year.
An original 2007 iPhone sold for an astonishing $63,356.40 in an online auction, more than 100 times its original cost. The phone was owned by Karen Green and was appraised in 2019, still sealed in its original box. The phone was put up for auction by LCG Auctions and sold after 27 bids, with the winning bidder's identity remaining unknown.
Meta Platforms (META.O) has launched their new subscription service, Meta Verified, which will allow users to verify their accounts with a government ID and receive a blue badge for extra protection against impersonation. The service will be available for Instagram and Facebook and will initially be available in Australia and New Zealand. The service is part of Meta’s effort to help content creators grow and build communities and protect users from fraudulent accounts.
Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has announced a new paid subscription program called "Meta Verified" that will allow users and businesses to verify their accounts with a blue badge. The service will require customers to provide a government ID to avoid fake accounts, and will come with other perks such as extra protection and direct access to customer support. The new system is expected to help users and businesses gain more trust and credibility, as well as reduce the number of fake accounts on the platform.
A bipartisan group of 27 attorneys general from states across the country are urging the Supreme Court to restrict the reach of Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act. The Biden administration and prominent Republicans, such as Sens. Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley, are in agreement on this issue. The Supreme Court is set to hear two cases that could decide the future of the internet, and the attorneys general are hoping to influence the court’s decision.
Tesla is recalling 362,758 vehicles due to a potential risk posed by its “Full Self Driving” driver assist feature, and is offering to repair them free of charge. The company is also rolling out a software update to the affected vehicles and developing a new version of the software to improve the system’s safety.