The Justice Department is investigating whether E. Jean Carroll committed perjury during her lawsuits against Donald Trump, focusing on undisclosed legal funding from billionaire Reid Hoffman. Carroll previously won multi-million dollar judgments against Trump for sexual assault and defamation.
Posts tagged as “the U.S. Court of Appeal”
A federal judge halts above-ground construction of President Trump's White House ballroom, allowing only underground bunker work to continue amid a legal battle over national security and historic preservation.
A federal appeals court temporarily allows construction of President Trump's White House ballroom to continue while sending the case back to a lower court to clarify national security concerns. The project faces legal challenges over presidential authority and historic preservation.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that Colorado's ban on conversion therapy for minors violates the First Amendment by regulating speech based on viewpoint rather than professional conduct. The decision, authored by Justice Gorsuch, emphasized that the law censors speech and sent the case back to lower courts for further review under stricter constitutional scrutiny. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, warning the ruling could hinder states' ability to regulate medical professionals and protect patients, highlighting the ongoing conflict between free speech rights and LGBTQ protections.
A federal appeals court has denied the Trump administration's attempt to halt an order mandating the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a mistakenly deported Maryland resident, emphasizing the importance of due process. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit criticized the administration's actions, highlighting tensions between its immigration policies and the judicial system's commitment to legal rights. The ruling underscores broader issues with deportation procedures and serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in upholding constitutional principles amid ongoing immigration policy debates.
The United States Supreme Court has been asked by the Justice Department to intervene in lower court rulings that ordered the reinstatement of two federal board members dismissed by former President Trump, arguing that these decisions undermine presidential authority and separation of powers. Solicitor General D. John Sauer contends that the protections against at-will firing do not apply to the members of the Merit Systems Protection Board and the National Labor Relations Board, seeking emergency relief from the Supreme Court. The Justice Department's appeal, which includes a request for a stay and for the Supreme Court to directly take up the case, highlights the urgency and potential implications for presidential power over independent federal agencies.
Hampton Dellinger, the former head of the Office of Special Counsel, has decided to end his legal battle against his dismissal by President Donald Trump following a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that allowed the termination to proceed. Despite expressing disagreement with the court's decision, Dellinger has opted not to continue pursuing legal action, as reported by NBC News. This development concludes a contentious period for the Office of Special Counsel, which is responsible for investigating whistleblower retaliation, as it continues its mission to ensure accountability and transparency in government operations.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has ruled in favor of President Donald Trump, allowing for the dismissal of Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel, marking a pivotal moment in the debate over presidential authority to terminate federal officials. This decision temporarily overturns a lower court's ruling that deemed Dellinger's termination unlawful, suggesting the president's dismissal powers were limited to specific cases of inefficiency, neglect, or malfeasance. The case, which is part of broader efforts by the Trump administration to reshape the federal workforce, could set a precedent for presidential authority, with the court expediting its review for a final decision.