Hampton Dellinger, the former head of the Office of Special Counsel, has decided to end his legal battle against his dismissal by President Donald Trump following a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that allowed the termination to proceed. Despite expressing disagreement with the court's decision, Dellinger has opted not to continue pursuing legal action, as reported by NBC News. This development concludes a contentious period for the Office of Special Counsel, which is responsible for investigating whistleblower retaliation, as it continues its mission to ensure accountability and transparency in government operations.
Posts tagged as “the U.S. Court of Appeal”
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has ruled in favor of President Donald Trump, allowing for the dismissal of Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel, marking a pivotal moment in the debate over presidential authority to terminate federal officials. This decision temporarily overturns a lower court's ruling that deemed Dellinger's termination unlawful, suggesting the president's dismissal powers were limited to specific cases of inefficiency, neglect, or malfeasance. The case, which is part of broader efforts by the Trump administration to reshape the federal workforce, could set a precedent for presidential authority, with the court expediting its review for a final decision.
Apple Inc. has won a temporary reprieve in its legal battle over the Apple Watch product, with an appeals court ordering a pause on a ban of the product that went into effect on Tuesday. The ban was enacted after the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) ruled that some Apple Watch models infringed on pulse-reader patents owned by Masimo, a medical tech company. Apple is appealing the ITC's ruling, and the appeals court has given the ITC until January 10 to respond to Apple's request for a longer stay while the issue moves through the courts.
Donald Trump has asked the Supreme Court to deny a request from Special Counsel Jack Smith to consider Trump's claims of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution before an appeals court. Trump's attorneys argue that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit should address the appeal first, as it is better equipped to consider the "historic topics" of the case. Trump has accused Smith of having a "partisan" interest in speeding up the case, and has asked the Supreme Court to allow the appeals court to consider the case first.
A federal judge has halted proceedings in the criminal case against former President Donald Trump, who is facing charges related to the 2020 election, while his appeal arguing presidential immunity is heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. All pending deadlines and court dates in the case have been put on pause, but not vacated, and if jurisdiction is returned to the judge, she will consider whether to retain or continue the dates of any still-future deadlines and proceedings, including the trial scheduled for March 4, 2024. The appeals court is expected to hear arguments in the case in the coming weeks, with the outcome of the case having major implications for Trump and the future of presidential immunity.
A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. has ruled to reinstate a gag order limiting what former President Donald Trump can say in the case involving his alleged attempts to thwart the transfer of power after the 2020 presidential election. The court noted that Trump's public statements have the potential to influence witnesses and jurors, and that the order was necessary to ensure a fair and impartial trial. Trump is now barred from making public comments about potential witnesses and prosecutors in the case, as well as lawyers in the case other than the special counsel, members of court staff and lawyers' staff, and their family members.
This week, a federal appeals court ruled 2-1 in favor of a lower court's finding that Texas' floating barrier on the Rio Grande, placed there by Governor Greg Abbott to deter illegal migrant crossings, was illegal. The court's decision requires Texas to stop any work on the barrier and move it to the riverbank, and is the second legal defeat for Texas this week over its border operations.
A three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has denied former President Donald Trump's claims of presidential immunity from civil lawsuits brought by a group of congressional Democrats and veteran Capitol Police officers. The judges noted that Trump is alleged to have instigated the Capitol attack during his re-election campaign, and that he had not demonstrated an entitlement to official-act immunity for his actions. The ruling is a major setback for Trump, allowing the cases to move forward and potentially leading to legal accountability for his actions surrounding the Capitol attack.