A federal judge has halted proceedings in the criminal case against former President Donald Trump, who is facing charges related to the 2020 election, while his appeal arguing presidential immunity is heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. All pending deadlines and court dates in the case have been put on pause, but not vacated, and if jurisdiction is returned to the judge, she will consider whether to retain or continue the dates of any still-future deadlines and proceedings, including the trial scheduled for March 4, 2024. The appeals court is expected to hear arguments in the case in the coming weeks, with the outcome of the case having major implications for Trump and the future of presidential immunity.
Posts tagged as “Donald Trump”
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal from Joseph Fischer, who is charged with offenses related to the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol. Fischer is seeking to dismiss a charge accusing him of obstructing an official proceeding, which could have major implications for the criminal prosecution of former President Donald Trump. The justices will consider the breadth of the federal obstruction law and the outcome of the case could have major implications for the future of the obstruction statute and the prosecution of those charged in connection with the Jan. 6 assault.
Special Counsel Jack Smith is attempting to prevent the trial of former President Donald Trump from slipping past the 2024 presidential election by filing a request with the Supreme Court to take up the case and rule quickly. Trump is currently the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential primary and Smith is attempting to bypass the appeals court to prevent any delays that could push back the trial until after the election. The Supreme Court has yet to respond to Smith's request, and it remains to be seen whether Smith will be successful in his efforts.
This trial in Washington will determine the amount of damages Rudy Giuliani must pay to two Georgia election workers, Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, after he falsely accused them of fraud in the 2020 election. Lawyers for the two women played audio recordings in court of graphic and racist threats they received after Giuliani's baseless claims. On Tuesday, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss will take the stand as the fourth plaintiffs' witness, and the judge will then decide the amount of damages Giuliani must pay.
Nikki Haley has become the latest high profile Republican presidential candidate to file primary paperwork in New Hampshire, with polls showing President Donald Trump with a commanding lead. Recent endorsements of other candidates have not moved the needle politically in Iowa, and the outcome of the New Hampshire primary could be determined by the 300,000 undeclared voters in the state.
Special Counsel Jack Smith has petitioned the Supreme Court to decide whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from prosecution for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. Smith argues that the question is of "imperative public importance" and should be resolved quickly so that Trump's trial can move forward. If the Supreme Court takes up the case, it could have far-reaching implications for the power of the presidency and the ability of former presidents to be held accountable.
Rudy Giuliani is set to go to trial on Monday to determine how much he will have to pay two former Georgia election workers for defamation. The two workers are seeking between $15.5 million to $43 million in damages for Giuliani's false accusations, which included claiming they were handing USB drives around "like they were vials of heroin or cocaine". Jury selection is expected to begin Monday in the high-profile defamation lawsuit, with the outcome of the trial setting a precedent for how much public figures can be held accountable for making false statements.
A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. has ruled to reinstate a gag order limiting what former President Donald Trump can say in the case involving his alleged attempts to thwart the transfer of power after the 2020 presidential election. The court noted that Trump's public statements have the potential to influence witnesses and jurors, and that the order was necessary to ensure a fair and impartial trial. Trump is now barred from making public comments about potential witnesses and prosecutors in the case, as well as lawyers in the case other than the special counsel, members of court staff and lawyers' staff, and their family members.