Press "Enter" to skip to content

Posts tagged as “anti-DEI”

DOJ Launches Civil Rights Probe into Ohio State Med School Admissions Following Affirmative Action Ruling

The U.S. Department of Justice has launched a civil rights investigation into Ohio State University College of Medicine’s admissions policies, requesting detailed applicant data amid heightened scrutiny of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives following the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling against affirmative action. Led by Harmeet Dhillon, a conservative activist heading the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, the inquiry reflects a broader crackdown on DEI policies at several universities. Separately, the DOJ and Department of Homeland Security are finalizing a controversial agreement to share sensitive voter registration data for immigration and criminal investigations, raising privacy and legal concerns.

Federal Employees File Class Action Against Trump Administration Over Alleged Unlawful DEI-Related Terminations

Federal employees from various government agencies have filed a class action complaint against the Trump administration, alleging unlawful termination related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activities, which they claim were targeted under an executive order issued by former President Donald Trump. The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board will review the case to determine if the administration's actions violated federal employees' rights. This legal action coincides with another significant case involving the Trump administration, examining potential violations of a judicial order blocking deportations, both of which could impact the understanding of executive authority and employee rights.

U.S. Appeals Court Allows Trump Administration to Temporarily Enforce Ban on DEI Programs, Overturning Previous Block

A U.S. appeals court has temporarily allowed the Trump administration to enforce a ban on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs within federal agencies and businesses with government contracts, overturning a previous block by a federal judge. The Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found the executive orders likely constitutional, despite concerns about potential First Amendment issues. While the ruling marks a victory for the administration, the judges acknowledged the need for a more nuanced approach, indicating that the constitutional implications of these measures could lead to further legal challenges.

We've updated the design to something a little more modern.  Got an opinion?  Let us know!