Press "Enter" to skip to content

Supreme Court Rules 6-3 in Favor of Colorado Graphic Artist, Granting Right to Refuse Service to Same-Sex Couples

Image courtesy of img.huffingtonpost.com

Key takeaways:

  • The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of a Colorado graphic artist, granting her the right to refuse service to same-sex couples due to her religious beliefs.
  • The ruling resolves a lingering question of whether states can compel artists to express messages that go against their religious beliefs in the name of non-discrimination.
  • The Supreme Court’s ruling is a major victory for religious freedom and a setback for those who seek to protect LGBTQ rights.

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of a Colorado graphic artist on Friday, granting her the right to refuse service to same-sex couples due to her religious beliefs. The case, 303 Creative v. Elenis, involved amateur web designer Lori Smith, who was never asked to make a website for a same-sex wedding.

The court’s decision is the latest in a string of successes for religious organizations and individuals who have sought relief from the high court and its conservative majority. All six conservative justices sided with Smith, while the court’s three liberals dissented.

The ruling resolves a lingering question, left unanswered since 2018, of whether states can compel artists to express messages that go against their religious beliefs in the name of non-discrimination. It also greatly expands the rights of people who want to discriminate against same-sex couples.

The case has been closely watched by both sides of the debate, with dueling protestors standing outside the Supreme Court as it heard arguments. Supporters of Smith argued that the First Amendment protects her right to express her religious beliefs, while opponents argued that the First Amendment does not protect discrimination.

The Supreme Court’s ruling is a major victory for religious freedom and a setback for those who seek to protect LGBTQ rights. It remains to be seen how this ruling will affect other cases involving religious freedom and discrimination.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap