Key takeaways:
- President Trump signed an executive order to impose stricter mail-in voting rules, including creating federally approved voter lists and limiting absentee ballots to those on the lists, with non-compliant states risking loss of federal funding.
- The order faces criticism and legal challenges over constitutionality and claims of widespread mail-in voting fraud, which lack substantial evidence; the Justice Department is also involved in related voter data and registration disputes.
- A federal judge blocked Trump’s $400 million White House ballroom construction without congressional approval, while political tensions rise ahead of midterms amid concerns over federal election intervention and election security personnel.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Tuesday aimed at imposing stricter rules on mail-in voting across the United States. The order directs states to tighten mail-in ballot procedures and instructs the Department of Homeland Security to compile a list of confirmed U.S. citizens eligible to vote in each state. This list would be created using data from the Social Security Administration, according to a White House official. Additionally, the order mandates that the U.S. Postal Service send absentee ballots only to individuals on these federally approved lists, with one envelope per ballot. States that do not comply with the order risk losing federal funding.
Trump justified the executive order by citing concerns about mail-in voting fraud, which he described as “legendary,” although he did not provide evidence to support widespread fraud claims. The president has publicly advocated for the SAVE Act, legislation that would require proof of citizenship for voter registration, a measure critics argue is unnecessary given that non-citizen voting is already illegal and rare. The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank aligned with Trump, estimates that there have been roughly 100 verified cases of non-citizen voting since 2000. Legal experts have noted that the president’s attempt to alter voting procedures without congressional approval is likely unconstitutional, as states traditionally hold authority over election rules.
The executive order is expected to face legal challenges. Democratic election lawyer Marc Elias stated on social media that he would sue if the order is signed, emphasizing his confidence in prevailing in court. The Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security are reportedly finalizing an agreement to use sensitive voter registration data for immigration and criminal investigations, a move that has sparked litigation in multiple states. The Justice Department has also filed lawsuits against several states, including California and Pennsylvania, for allegedly failing to provide voter registration rolls as required by federal law.
In a separate development, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, appointed by former President George W. Bush, issued a preliminary injunction halting construction on a $400 million ballroom that President Trump is attempting to build over the East Wing of the White House. The judge ruled that Trump must obtain congressional approval before proceeding with the project, siding with the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which sued to pause construction pending federal review. Judge Leon emphasized that the president is a steward, not the owner, of the White House and found no existing statute granting Trump authority to undertake the project without legislative consent. The ruling allows a 14-day window for the administration to appeal and address logistical concerns related to halting construction.
Meanwhile, political tensions continue to rise ahead of the midterm elections. Senator Mark Warner (D-VA), vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, published an op-ed warning that Trump’s efforts to override state election authority could lead to a national emergency declaration. Warner suggested that Trump might use allegations of foreign interference, including actions involving Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and the seizure of voting machines, as a pretext for federal intervention in elections. Warner also highlighted concerns about individuals involved in attempts to overturn the 2020 election now holding influential positions within the federal government, such as Kurt Olsen, the White House’s director of election security and integrity. These developments underscore the contentious political environment as the nation approaches the midterm voting period.




Be First to Comment